There are a number of acceptable calculation methods for determining U-Factors, and the appropriate method depends on the type of framing or discontinuity in the wall. Heat flow through construction assemblies with metal framing and/or sheathing is more complex and requires special consideration. The following table shows the acceptable calculation methods that can be used with each type of construction.
Applicability of Calculation Methods for Opaque Construction Assemblies
Metal Sheathing |
Metal Sheathing |
Non-Metal Sheathing |
Non-Metal Sheathing |
|
Laboratory Tests |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Series-Parallel Path (Isothermal Planes) |
|
X |
|
X |
Two-Dimensional Models |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Parallel Path Correction Factors |
X |
|||
Zone Method |
X |
|||
Thermal Bridges in Sheet Metal Construction |
X |
Using a computer, you can model two-dimensional heat flow to more accurately predict the U-Factor of a complex construction assembly. While the series-parallel path calculation method assumes that heat flows in a straight line from the warm side of the construction to the cooler side, with two dimensional models, heat can also flow laterally in the construction, following the path of least resistance. Calculating two-dimensional heat flow involves advanced mathematics and is best performed with a computer. A model is set up by dividing the construction into a large number of small pieces, and defining the thermal resistance between each piece. The result is analyzed with electric circuit theory. The network consists of a rectangular array of nodes connected by resistance. As in the real material, the energy flow will take the line of least resistance. The computer can perform the complicated calculations necessary to solve the network, yielding the U-Factor for the unit at steady state. It can also solve the network for dynamic energy conditions. Short of performing laboratory tests, this is the most accurate method available for determining the U-Factors of concrete and masonry walls. 